pari-mutuel vs fixed odds: payouts, edge, and when each wins
fixed odds feels simple: lock a price, get a guaranteed payout. pari-mutuel feels different: bet into a pool and your final payout depends on where the crowd ends up. if you care about expected value, the difference isn’t cosmetic—it changes where the edge hides, what risks you take, and what “good execution” actually means.
the quick answer
choose fixed odds when
- you need payout certainty at bet time
- you can beat the close (positive CLV) over time
- the market is liquid and you can shop for best prices
choose pari-mutuel when
- you want transparent crowd pricing (the pool is the market)
- you believe the crowd is wrong and want contrarian upside
- you prefer an explicit fee over embedded margin
both systems can be “good” or “bad” depending on fees, liquidity, and execution. the point is knowing what game you’re playing.
pari-mutuel
pool betting
used by:
horse racing (tote), pool betting, baozi markets
fixed odds
sportsbook odds
used by:
sportsbooks, bookmakers, betting apps
how fixed odds really works
in fixed odds, the “price” is a promise. you accept a line and the sportsbook guarantees the payout. sportsbooks aren’t trying to predict the future for fun—they’re running a risk book. that’s why the details matter: the odds include margin, lines move, and sharp action is often restricted.
fixed odds in 4 steps
- the bookmaker posts a price (probability estimate + margin).
- you lock that price when you place your bet.
- the bookmaker updates the line as news and money arrive.
- risk is managed via line movement, bet limits, and market rules.
worked example (decimal odds)
YES at 1.80 and NO at 2.10.
you bet 10 SOL on YES.
if YES wins, payout = 10 × 1.80 = 18 SOL (profit 8 SOL).
even if the market later moves to 1.50, your ticket remains 1.80.
how pari-mutuel (pool/tote) works
pari-mutuel is “mutual betting”: everyone on each outcome is on the same team. all stakes go into a common pool, a transparent fee is taken, and winners split what remains in proportion to their stake.
the payout formula
payout = (your stake / winning pool) × total pool × (1 − fee)
“fee” here is any explicit takeout/platform fee. the other moving part is execution: pool sizes can change up to close.
worked example (two-outcome pool)
total pool = 100 SOL
YES pool = 70 SOL, NO pool = 30 SOL
you bet 10 SOL on NO
if NO wins, your share = 10/30 = 33.33%
payout (before fee) = 33.33% × 100 = 33.33 SOL
the tradeoff
in pari-mutuel, you don’t know your exact payout the moment you bet—because the pool can change. the “price” you get is the closing pool.
side-by-side comparison
| factor | pari-mutuel | fixed odds |
|---|---|---|
| opponent | the crowd / pool | the bookmaker |
| odds stability | change until close | locked at bet time |
| house edge | explicit fee / takeout | embedded margin (vig/overround) |
| transparency | pool visibility | bookmaker model |
| big payouts | pool-limited, can be large | often capped/limited |
| price certainty | known at close | known instantly |
| limits | rare for being sharp | common for winners |
where the edge hides: takeout vs vig
bettors often compare the wrong numbers. the right question is: how much probability are you paying for the payout you receive?fixed odds charges you through the price (often invisibly). pari-mutuel usually charges you through an explicit fee, but you still pay for poor execution in thin pools.
fixed odds: margin is baked into prices
with decimal odds, implied probability is 1 / odds. add both sides together; anything above 100% is the “overround”.
YES 1.80 → 1/1.80 = 55.56%
NO 2.10 → 1/2.10 = 47.62%
total = 103.18% → ~3.18% margin
margins vary widely by sport and market. lower vig helps, but execution and limits also matter in practice.
pari-mutuel: fee is explicit
in a pool, you don’t pay a hidden margin inside the odds. a transparent fee/takeout is applied, then winners split what remains.
payout ≈ (stake / winning pool) × total pool × (1 − fee)
on baozi, fees are specified per market. your “true cost” is that fee plus any slippage from betting big into a small pool.
transparency is the point: you can see the pool, the fee, and what changed your expected payout.
how to bet smarter in each system
fixed odds: timing + price shopping
- line shop: tiny price differences compound over time.
- beat the close: CLV is the cleanest signal you’re not just variance.
- avoid high-margin markets: props/novelties often have worse pricing.
- plan for limits: winners often get restricted.
pari-mutuel: pool reading + execution
- watch pool drift: if money floods one side without new info, the other side may become value.
- bet late when it matters: waiting reduces uncertainty about the closing pool.
- respect slippage: big stakes vs a small pool reduce your own payout.
- think in probability: convert pools → implied probability → compare to your estimate.
when to use each system
choose pari-mutuel when:
- • you want transparent crowd-priced odds
- • you believe the crowd is wrong (contrarian bets)
- • you can tolerate payout uncertainty until close
- • the fee is low and explicit
- • you’re willing to optimize timing and execution
choose fixed odds when:
- • you need to lock a specific price now
- • you spot value before the market moves
- • you can shop odds across books
- • you care about price certainty more than pool transparency
- • the market is deep enough to accept your stake
where prediction markets fit
“prediction market” describes what you’re betting on (a question), not necessarily how pricing works. in practice you’ll see three common mechanics:
1) fixed odds (book model)
a house posts a price and takes the other side. great for certainty; margin is embedded.
2) continuous trading (order book / AMM)
prices move as traders buy and sell. execution depends on liquidity and spreads; “fees” can be explicit or implicit.
3) pari-mutuel pools (baozi)
winners split the pool with a transparent fee. prices reflect crowd belief, and payouts are mechanically tied to the pool—not a bookmaker’s balance sheet.
faq
is pari-mutuel always better than fixed odds?
no. if you need to lock a price and you can consistently beat the closing line, fixed odds can be excellent. pari-mutuel shines when you want transparent crowd pricing and an explicit fee model.
why do sportsbooks limit winning bettors?
because fixed odds creates asymmetric risk for the bookmaker. if you consistently take mispriced lines, the sportsbook’s easiest defense is to reduce your allowed stake or restrict markets.
can pari-mutuel be “unfair”?
it can be if fees are high, pools are thin, or late money regularly moves the price against you. the model is transparent, but execution and liquidity still matter.
how do i compare a pool price to fixed odds?
convert the pool into implied probabilities. then compare those probabilities to your own estimate. the edge comes from the difference between your probability and the crowd’s implied probability after fees.
why does baozi use pari-mutuel?
because it’s the cleanest way to make “odds = crowd belief” without needing a bookmaker or market maker. it’s transparent, on-chain, and avoids the adversarial dynamic of a book restricting winners.
the bottom line
neither system is universally “better”. fixed odds optimizes for certainty and convenience. pari-mutuel optimizes for transparent crowd pricing and a clean fee model. what matters is matching the system to your edge: timing and price-shopping for fixed odds, pool-reading and execution for pari-mutuel.
baozi uses pari-mutuel because it creates a fairer market structure for prediction: no hidden margin, no bookmaker limiting winners, and prices derived from the crowd.
learn more
experience pari-mutuel betting
watch the pool move in real time and see how the crowd prices reality.
try baozi markets